As a general rule
increased overlap moves torque into higher revs and decreased overlap gives better
torque in lower revs. Explanation is that overlap improves gas exchange in high
revs but decreases vacuum in low, which results in lower intake velocity and
poor mixing.
B6ZE WITH STOCK, 264/9 AND 272/9 CAMS
So what happens in
real life with B6ZE? Here are two examples. Baseline is from Import Tuner Magazine's
archives (intake, exhaust and JR cat). Real life examples are from two Finnish
private engine builders, both measured at the same dyno. Graphs are in rear
wheel figures. Pay attention, don't concentrate on the numbers! Note how the torque
curves look like and where the power starts to drop.
Nro 1 specs: 79 mm high
comp pistons (1.64 liter), 3-angle ground stock valves, mild street porting port matched intake manifold, 4-2-1 header (origin unknown), stock cat, sports exhaust, afm delete, stock 56 mm
throttle body and 264deg/9mm Schrick cams (German street and racing
cam manufacturer).
First I must note,
that there is an odd dip in Nro 1’s torque curve. I think that could be sorted
with some map and/or intake tuning.
Some
observations:
- Schricks start to
pull as low as the stock cams
- Torque stays up about
1000 rpm higher with Schricks (measured at a point where still 95% of max
torque occurs)
- 95% of max power at
6800 rpm with stocks and and at 7300 rpm with Schricks
- Todas start to show
some peakiness, as they start to pull hard from 4000 rpm
- Todas keep torque
up until about 7300 rpm (95% rule)
- 95% of max power at
8000 rpm with Todas
- All three engines are running with stock intake manifolds and throttle bodies
- All three engines are running with stock intake manifolds and throttle bodies
- Torque/displacement-comparison
shows no significant increase in max torque, but increased flow in high revs
pumps power up
SAME CAMS – DIFFERENT TIMING
Here is a demo how
timing affects the torque and power. Test was done with engine Nro 2. You can see that increased
overlap (from 8 to 26 @ 1 mm) makes higher numbers from mid to high revs. But
what really happens here? In theory bigger overlap should give better flow in
higher revs. Max power gains are moderate, only about 5 rwhp. Torque gains are significant,
but they are in mid revs. Retarded timing was also tested. It slightly dropped torque between 4k and 5,5k, but had no effect in high revs.
Obviously engine has
reached its maximum torque, about 140 rwNm, in current setup
and flow reaches its limit at 6750-7000 rpm. What happens when intake cam is
advanced, in this case 9 degrees, is that dynamic compression increases.
Advancing intake means that valves open earlier and also close earlier. Early
closing means that there is more cylinder volume to be compressed, thus higher
dynamic compression. More compression -> higher thermal efficiency -> more
torque.
CAM TIMING CHARTS
Here is a collection of timing charts illustrating
different cam timing options. It is easy to see overlap in degrees in circular
timing charts. ‘Valve lift versus crank angle’ -charts demonstrates overlap in
millimeters. If you find this information useful, please leave a comment!
CONCLUSION
More torque requires more flow. In reasonably tuned hot NA engines practical maximum torque per liter seems to be in 110Nm/l ballpark (in crank figures for 'hot street tune’). High torque in high revs means high power. To keep torque up above 7000rpm is a true test for engine’s, and B6ZE's, breathing abilities. For that, I would suggest, you need unrestricted (preferably tuned) intake and exhaust plus high flowing cylinder head with larger valves and 280 deg or bigger cams.